Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
285 vs 22(-92.3%)
Score Diff
17 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
12 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Acı sos are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 285.0 kcal and Acı sos has 22.0 kcal. The difference is 263.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Acı sos | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 42 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.2 mg | 0.16 mg | -20.0% |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 498 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 34.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 0.48 mg | -77.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 1.4 g | -44.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.45 mg | — |
| Enerji | 1192.4 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 285 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 18 mg | -65.4% |
| Fruktoz | 32 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 34 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 64 mg | 14 mg | -78.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 72 g | 3.7 g | -94.9% |
| Kül | 1.8 g | 5.73 g | +218.3% |
| Magnezyum | 55 mg | 11 mg | -80.0% |
| Mangan | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 0.82 mg | -48.8% |
| Potasyum | 800 mg | 164 mg | -79.5% |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.95 g | -36.7% |
| Sodyum | 25 mg | 2640 mg | +10460.0% |
| Su | 24 g | 89.2 g | +271.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.42 g | +110.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 67 g | 2.1 g | -96.9% |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 0.22 mg | -51.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Acı sos.
Acı sos has less energy per 100 g (22 kcal versus 285 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 25 mg and Acı sos has 2640 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hurma Özü (Organik/Köy Usulü) 17, Acı sos 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.