Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
52.6 kcal
Score
52 / 100
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (52) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
75 vs 52.6(-29.9%)
Score Diff
33 vs 52(+57.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Hurma eriği
Score leader
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
6 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hurma eriği and Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hurma eriği has 75.0 kcal and Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 52.6 kcal. The difference is 22.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 52. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hurma eriği | Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 81 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.032 mg | +6.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.038 mg | +90.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.055 mg | -45.0% |
| Bakir | 0.11 mg | 0.09 mg | -18.2% |
| Beta Karoten | 970 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 15 mg | 26.2 mg | +74.7% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 0.69 mg | +72.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 6.5 g | +80.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.87 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 8 µg | 21 µg | +162.5% |
| Fosfor | 17 mg | 29 mg | +70.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.6 µg | 7.8 µg | +200.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 25 mg | +66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.6 g | 11.94 g | -35.8% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 834 µg | 136 µg | -83.7% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 22 mg | +100.0% |
| Mangan | 0.35 mg | 0.67 mg | +91.4% |
| Niasin | 0.3 mg | 0.598 mg | +99.3% |
| Potasyum | 161 mg | 151 mg | -6.2% |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.2 g | +50.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 79.5 g | 85.75 g | +7.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.65 g | +225.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 12.5 g | 4.42 g | -64.6% |
| Çinko | 0.11 mg | 0.42 mg | +281.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hurma eriği and Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (52.6 kcal versus 75 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Hurma eriği has 0.11 mg and Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 0.42 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hurma eriği 33, Ahududu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 52.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.