Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
12 kcal
Score
63 / 100
Acı Biber Sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (63) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
48 vs 12(-75.0%)
Score Diff
61 vs 63(+3.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acı Biber Sosu
Higher energy
Yaban Turpu
Score leader
Acı Biber Sosu
Nutrient split
21 - 18 (tie: 26)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yaban Turpu and Acı Biber Sosu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yaban Turpu has 48.0 kcal and Acı Biber Sosu has 12.0 kcal. The difference is 36.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 63. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yaban Turpu | Acı Biber Sosu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 82 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 62 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.01 mg | 0.03 mg | +200.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.08 mg | +300.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0.15 mg | +114.3% |
| Bakir | 0.06 mg | 0.07 mg | +16.7% |
| Besin folati | 57 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 1 µg | 919 µg | +91800.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 68 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 24.9 mg | 4.5 mg | -81.9% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 1.16 mg | +176.2% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.3 g | 0.6 g | -81.8% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.01 mg | 0.01 mg | 0.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 48 kj | 12 kj | -75.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 57 µg | 2 µg | -96.5% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 31 mg | 23 mg | -25.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.3 µg | 0.2 µg | -84.6% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 56 mg | 12 mg | -78.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.29 g | 0.8 g | -92.9% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 10 µg | 10 µg | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 12 mg | -55.6% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.13 g | 0.06 g | -53.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.39 mg | 0.18 mg | -53.8% |
| Potasyum | 246 mg | 128 mg | -48.0% |
| Protein | 1.18 g | 1.29 g | +9.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.28 g | 0.4 g | +42.9% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.05 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 2.8 µg | 0.5 µg | -82.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.06 g | 0.09 g | +50.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 633 mg | +50.7% |
| Su | 85.08 g | 95.17 g | +11.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.09 g | 0.11 g | +22.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 57 µg | 1 µg | -98.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | 6.5 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.13 g | 0.06 g | -53.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.69 g | 0.76 g | +10.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.34 g | 0.4 g | +17.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.99 g | 0.13 g | -98.4% |
| Çinko | 0.83 mg | 0.16 mg | -80.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yaban Turpu and Acı Biber Sosu.
Acı Biber Sosu has less energy per 100 g (12 kcal versus 48 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Yaban Turpu has 1 µg and Acı Biber Sosu has 919 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yaban Turpu 61, Acı Biber Sosu 63.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.