Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
182 vs 326(+79.1%)
Score Diff
50 vs 23(-54.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana
Higher energy
Leh Sosis, Domuz
Score leader
Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana
Nutrient split
37 - 20 (tie: 16)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana and Leh Sosis, Domuz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana has 182.0 kcal and Leh Sosis, Domuz has 326.0 kcal. The difference is 144.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 50 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
73 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana | Leh Sosis, Domuz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 0 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alanin | 1.23 g | 0.9 g | -26.8% |
| Arjinin | 1.25 g | 0.93 g | -25.6% |
| Aspartik asit | 1.65 g | 1.29 g | -21.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.5 mg | +525.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.35 µg | 0.98 µg | -58.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.15 mg | -16.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.27 mg | 0.19 mg | -29.6% |
| Bakir | 0.1 mg | 0.09 mg | -10.0% |
| Besin folati | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 40 iu | — | — |
| Demir | 2.2 mg | 1.44 mg | -34.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji | 182 kj | 326 kj | +79.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.7 g | 0.54 g | -22.9% |
| Fitosteroller | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 137 mg | 136 mg | -0.7% |
| Glisin | 1.38 g | 0.99 g | -28.3% |
| Glutamik asit | 2.68 g | 2.12 g | -20.9% |
| Histidin | 0.54 g | 0.44 g | -18.5% |
| Izolosin | 0.76 g | 0.61 g | -19.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 12 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.18 g | 1.63 g | -25.2% |
| Kolesterol | 50 mg | 70 mg | +40.0% |
| Kül | 3.98 g | 2.4 g | -39.7% |
| Lizin | 1.52 g | 1.11 g | -27.0% |
| Losin | 1.39 g | 1.08 g | -22.3% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 14 mg | -12.5% |
| Mangan | 0.04 mg | 0.05 mg | +25.0% |
| Metiyonin | 0.45 g | 0.38 g | -15.6% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.62 g | 0.95 g | +53.2% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 4.2 g | 12.58 g | +199.5% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.17 mg | 3.44 mg | -17.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.49 mg | 0.45 mg | -8.2% |
| Potasyum | 291 mg | 237 mg | -18.6% |
| Prolin | 1.01 g | 0.71 g | -29.7% |
| Protein | 18.58 g | 14.1 g | -24.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.38 g | 2.79 g | +634.2% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.11 g | 0.29 g | +163.6% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 15.6 µg | 17.7 µg | +13.5% |
| Serin | 0.76 g | 0.58 g | -23.7% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.02 g | 0.07 g | +250.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.02 g | 0.07 g | +250.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.28 g | 0.4 g | +42.9% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.4 g | 6.4 g | +166.7% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.36 g | 3.38 g | +148.5% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sistin | 0.22 g | 0.16 g | -27.3% |
| Sodyum | 1322 mg | 876 mg | -33.7% |
| Su | 64.78 g | 53.15 g | -18.0% |
| Tirozin | 0.56 g | 0.44 g | -21.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.08 g | 10.33 g | +153.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.82 g | 13.52 g | +180.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 10.5 g | 28.72 g | +173.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.49 g | 3.08 g | +528.6% |
| Treonin | 0.78 g | 0.59 g | -24.4% |
| Triptofan | 0.15 g | 0.14 g | -6.7% |
| Valin | 0.85 g | 0.68 g | -20.0% |
| Çinko | 3.25 mg | 1.93 mg | -40.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana and Leh Sosis, Domuz.
Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana has less energy per 100 g (182 kcal versus 326 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit), Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana has 0.38 g and Leh Sosis, Domuz has 2.79 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bal Rulo Sosis, Dana 50, Leh Sosis, Domuz 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.