Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
72 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Hindiba yaprağı has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
23 vs 72(+213.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 45(-55.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hindiba yaprağı
Higher energy
Arpacık Soğan
Score leader
Hindiba yaprağı
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hindiba yaprağı and Arpacık Soğan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hindiba yaprağı has 23.0 kcal and Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal. The difference is 49.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hindiba yaprağı | Arpacık Soğan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 66 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 286 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.06 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 0.02 mg | -80.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.105 mg | 0.345 mg | +228.6% |
| Bakir | 0.3 mg | 0.088 mg | -70.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 24 mg | 8 mg | -66.7% |
| Demir | 0.9 mg | 1.2 mg | +33.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 4 g | 3.2 g | -20.0% |
| Fosfor | 47 mg | 60 mg | +27.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 297.6 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 100 mg | 37 mg | -63.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.7 g | 16.8 g | +257.4% |
| Kül | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 21 mg | -30.0% |
| Mangan | 0.43 mg | 0.292 mg | -32.1% |
| Niasin | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 334 mg | -20.5% |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 2.5 g | +47.1% |
| Selenyum | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 45 mg | 12 mg | -73.3% |
| Su | 92 g | 79.8 g | -13.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 110 µg | 34 µg | -69.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.1 g | -66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 7.87 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.42 mg | 0.4 mg | -4.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hindiba yaprağı and Arpacık Soğan.
Hindiba yaprağı has less energy per 100 g (23 kcal versus 72 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Hindiba yaprağı has 4.7 g and Arpacık Soğan has 16.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hindiba yaprağı 100, Arpacık Soğan 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.