Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
441 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 441(+44000.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 50(-45.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Soya unu
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
1 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hibiskus çayı and Soya unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal and Soya unu has 441.0 kcal. The difference is 440.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hibiskus çayı | Soya unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.7 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.57 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.002 mg | 2.4 mg | +119900.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 6.4 mg | +7900.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 9.6 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 305 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 589 mg | +58800.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 210 mg | +2525.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.08 g | 31.9 g | +39775.0% |
| Kül | — | 4.9 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 429 mg | +14200.0% |
| Mangan | 0.012 mg | 3 mg | +24900.0% |
| Niasin | 0.04 mg | 2.6 mg | +6400.0% |
| Potasyum | 9 mg | 2510 mg | +27788.9% |
| Protein | 0 g | 37.8 g | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 13 mg | +225.0% |
| Su | 99.58 g | 5.3 g | -94.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 20.6 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 3.9 mg | +38900.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hibiskus çayı and Soya unu.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 441 kcal).
For measured Bakir, Hibiskus çayı has 0.002 mg and Soya unu has 2.4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hibiskus çayı 91, Soya unu 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.