Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
185 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 185(+18400.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 46(-49.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Ördek yumurtası
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
1 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hibiskus çayı and Ördek yumurtası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal and Ördek yumurtası has 185.0 kcal. The difference is 184.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
12 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hibiskus çayı | Ördek yumurtası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 670 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 192 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 5.4 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.52 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.002 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 194 iu | — |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 3.85 mg | +4712.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 80 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 220 mg | +21900.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 64 mg | +700.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.08 g | 1.45 g | +1712.5% |
| Kolesterol | — | 884 mg | — |
| Kül | — | 1.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 17 mg | +466.7% |
| Mangan | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 9 mg | 222 mg | +2366.7% |
| Protein | 0 g | 12.81 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 36.4 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 146 mg | +3550.0% |
| Su | 99.58 g | 70.8 g | -28.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 13.77 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 0.93 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 1.41 mg | +14000.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hibiskus çayı and Ördek yumurtası.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 185 kcal).
For measured Fosfor, Hibiskus çayı has 1 mg and Ördek yumurtası has 220 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hibiskus çayı 91, Ördek yumurtası 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.