Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
295 kcal
Score
9 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 295(+29400.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 9(-90.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Mastic sakızı
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
1 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hibiskus çayı and Mastic sakızı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal and Mastic sakızı has 295.0 kcal. The difference is 294.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hibiskus çayı | Mastic sakızı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bakir | 0.002 mg | 0.22 mg | +10900.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 1.9 mg | +2275.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 78.5 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.2 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 1234 kj | — |
| Fitosteroller | — | 45 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 22 mg | +2100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 65 mg | +712.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.08 g | 84.2 g | +105150.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 18 mg | +500.0% |
| Mangan | 0.012 mg | 0.45 mg | +3650.0% |
| Niasin | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 9 mg | 95 mg | +955.6% |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 12 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 99.58 g | 2.2 g | -97.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 1.8 g | — |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.3 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 0.85 mg | +8400.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hibiskus çayı and Mastic sakızı.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 295 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Hibiskus çayı has 0.08 g and Mastic sakızı has 84.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hibiskus çayı 91, Mastic sakızı 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.