Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
19 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 19(+1800.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 29(-68.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Kombu çayı
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
2 - 8 (tie: 5)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hibiskus çayı and Kombu çayı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal and Kombu çayı has 19.0 kcal. The difference is 18.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hibiskus çayı | Kombu çayı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.05 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.002 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | 1.2 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 3 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 5 mg | +400.0% |
| Kafein | — | 5.5 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 7 mg | -12.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.08 g | 3.9 g | +4775.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 3 mg | 0.0% |
| Mangan | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.04 mg | 0.25 mg | +525.0% |
| Potasyum | 9 mg | 22 mg | +144.4% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 6 mg | +50.0% |
| Su | 99.58 g | 95.3 g | -4.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 3.6 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 0.04 mg | +300.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hibiskus çayı and Kombu çayı.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 19 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Hibiskus çayı has 0.08 g and Kombu çayı has 3.9 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hibiskus çayı 91, Kombu çayı 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.