Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
70 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
1 vs 70(+6900.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 23(-74.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Kaki
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
2 - 14 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Hibiskus çayı and Kaki are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal and Kaki has 70.0 kcal. The difference is 69.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Hibiskus çayı | Kaki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 1627 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 81 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.002 mg | 0.113 mg | +5550.0% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 253 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 1447 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | 7.5 mg | +525.0% |
| Demir | 0.08 mg | 0.15 mg | +87.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 3.6 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.73 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 8 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 1 mg | 17 mg | +1600.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 2.6 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 8 mg | 8 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.08 g | 18.59 g | +23137.5% |
| Kül | — | 0.33 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 834 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 9 mg | +200.0% |
| Mangan | 0.012 mg | 0.355 mg | +2858.3% |
| Niasin | 0.04 mg | 0.1 mg | +150.0% |
| Potasyum | 9 mg | 161 mg | +1688.9% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.58 g | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 1 mg | -75.0% |
| Su | 99.58 g | 80.32 g | -19.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 1 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.19 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 12.53 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.01 mg | 0.11 mg | +1000.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Hibiskus çayı and Kaki.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Hibiskus çayı has 0.08 g and Kaki has 18.59 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Hibiskus çayı 91, Kaki 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.