Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43 kcal
Score
61 / 100
Kırmızı Pancar has a higher nutrition quality score (61) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
41 vs 43(+4.9%)
Score Diff
44 vs 61(+38.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kırmızı Pancar
Higher energy
Kırmızı Pancar
Score leader
Kırmızı Pancar
Nutrient split
7 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Havuç and Kırmızı Pancar are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Havuç has 41.0 kcal and Kırmızı Pancar has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 2.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 44 and 61. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Havuç | Kırmızı Pancar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 835 µg | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 3477 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.031 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.138 mg | 0.067 mg | -51.4% |
| Bakir | — | 0.075 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 8285 µg | 20 µg | -99.8% |
| Betain | — | 128.7 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5.9 mg | 4.9 mg | -16.9% |
| Demir | 0.3 mg | 0.8 mg | +166.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.8 g | 0.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 41 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 19 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 35 mg | 40 mg | +14.3% |
| Fruktoz | 0.59 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 1.94 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 13.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 33 mg | 16 mg | -51.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 9.56 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 9.61 g | — | — |
| Kül | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 23 mg | +91.7% |
| Mangan | 0.141 mg | 0.329 mg | +133.3% |
| Niasin | 0.983 mg | 0.334 mg | -66.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.155 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 320 mg | 325 mg | +1.6% |
| Protein | 0.93 g | 1.61 g | +73.1% |
| Sakkaroz | 2.29 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 69 mg | 78 mg | +13.0% |
| Su | 88.29 g | 87.58 g | -0.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 109 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.24 g | 0.17 g | -29.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.74 g | 6.76 g | +42.6% |
| Çinko | — | 0.35 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Havuç and Kırmızı Pancar.
Havuç has less energy per 100 g (41 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured Demir, Havuç has 0.3 mg and Kırmızı Pancar has 0.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Havuç 44, Kırmızı Pancar 61.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.