Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
525 vs 418(-20.4%)
Score Diff
45 vs 29(-35.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Higher energy
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Score leader
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Nutrient split
16 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) and Akçaağaç tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has 525.0 kcal and Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal. The difference is 107.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
24 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) | Akçaağaç tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.85 mg | 0.35 mg | -58.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 0.18 mg | +80.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.42 mg | +68.0% |
| Bakir | 1.63 mg | 0.85 mg | -47.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 9.76 mg | 4.8 mg | -50.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 19.5 g | 11.5 g | -41.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.77 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 82 µg | 62 µg | -24.4% |
| Fosfor | 870 mg | 390 mg | -55.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 1438 mg | 145 mg | -89.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 28.13 g | 38.6 g | +37.2% |
| Kül | 6.37 g | 3.7 g | -41.9% |
| Magnezyum | 347 mg | 180 mg | -48.1% |
| Mangan | 6.71 mg | 2.6 mg | -61.3% |
| Niasin | 0.9 mg | 2.1 mg | +133.3% |
| Potasyum | 719 mg | 650 mg | -9.6% |
| Protein | 17.99 g | 22.4 g | +24.5% |
| Sodyum | 26 mg | 9 mg | -65.4% |
| Su | 5.95 g | 18.5 g | +210.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.52 g | 2.1 g | -53.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.98 g | 6.5 g | +8.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 41.56 g | 16.8 g | -59.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 28.57 g | 7.2 g | -74.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.99 g | 4.2 g | +40.5% |
| Çinko | 7.9 mg | 3.2 mg | -59.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) and Akçaağaç tohumu.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 525 kcal).
For measured Su, Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has 5.95 g and Akçaağaç tohumu has 18.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) 45, Akçaağaç tohumu 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.