Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
120 vs 22(-81.7%)
Score Diff
45 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Higher energy
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Score leader
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi
Nutrient split
17 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi and Acı sos are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 120.0 kcal and Acı sos has 22.0 kcal. The difference is 98.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 45 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi | Acı sos | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 245 µg | 42 µg | -82.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.34 mg | 0.16 mg | -52.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 2680 µg | 498 µg | -81.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 34.5 mg | 34.8 mg | +0.9% |
| Demir | 2.15 mg | 0.48 mg | -77.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.2 g | 1.4 g | -66.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.2 mg | 1.45 mg | -54.7% |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 18 mg | -65.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 14.5 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 48 mg | 14 mg | -70.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.6 g | 3.7 g | -65.1% |
| Kül | 2.95 g | 5.73 g | +94.2% |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 11 mg | -57.7% |
| Niasin | 1.75 mg | 0.82 mg | -53.1% |
| Potasyum | 410 mg | 164 mg | -60.0% |
| Protein | 2.85 g | 0.95 g | -66.7% |
| Sodyum | 920 mg | 2640 mg | +187.0% |
| Su | 72 g | 89.2 g | +23.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.08 g | 0.08 g | -92.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.85 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.4 g | 0.42 g | -94.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.6 g | 2.1 g | -41.7% |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.22 mg | -62.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi and Acı sos.
Acı sos has less energy per 100 g (22 kcal versus 120 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi has 920 mg and Acı sos has 2640 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Harissa Tunus Acı Ezmesi 45, Acı sos 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.