Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
145 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Biber Biftek has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
132 vs 145(+9.8%)
Score Diff
49 vs 58(+18.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber Biftek
Higher energy
Biber Biftek
Score leader
Biber Biftek
Nutrient split
20 - 28 (tie: 17)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Makarnalı Dana Güveç and Biber Biftek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Makarnalı Dana Güveç has 132.0 kcal and Biber Biftek has 145.0 kcal. The difference is 13.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Makarnalı Dana Güveç | Biber Biftek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 9 µg | -86.2% |
| Alfa Karoten | 259 µg | 7 µg | -97.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | 0.05 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.76 µg | 0.61 µg | -19.7% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.08 mg | -27.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.17 mg | 0.26 mg | +52.9% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.07 mg | 0.0% |
| Besin folati | 10 µg | 13 µg | +30.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 643 µg | 101 µg | -84.3% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 2 µg | 2 µg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | 22.6 mg | +545.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.18 mg | 1.24 mg | +5.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 0.7 g | -36.4% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.16 mg | 1.43 mg | +793.8% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 132 kj | 145 kj | +9.8% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 38 µg | 13 µg | -65.8% |
| Folik asit | 16 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 88 mg | 89 mg | +1.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 3.2 µg | 19.5 µg | +509.4% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 14 mg | 17 mg | +21.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.81 g | 4.34 g | -59.9% |
| Kolesterol | 27 mg | 32 mg | +18.5% |
| Likopen | 270 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 80 µg | 173 µg | +116.3% |
| Magnezyum | 15 mg | 16 mg | +6.7% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.18 g | 0.16 g | -11.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.95 g | 3.63 g | +86.2% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.04 g | +300.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.31 mg | 2.26 mg | -2.2% |
| Potasyum | 184 mg | 202 mg | +9.8% |
| Protein | 9.76 g | 11.88 g | +21.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.22 g | 2.11 g | +859.1% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.03 g | 0.29 g | +866.7% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 13.8 µg | 11.6 µg | -15.9% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.14 g | 0.1 g | -28.6% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.13 g | 1.33 g | +17.7% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.6 g | 0.52 g | -13.3% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 299 mg | 244 mg | -18.4% |
| Su | 73.03 g | 73.55 g | +0.7% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.96 g | 2.01 g | +2.6% |
| Toplam Folat | 27 µg | 13 µg | -51.9% |
| Toplam Kolin | 30.3 mg | 46 mg | +51.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.23 g | 3.83 g | +71.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.23 g | 9.12 g | +74.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.27 g | 2.42 g | +796.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.92 g | 1.67 g | +81.5% |
| Çinko | 2.07 mg | 1.96 mg | -5.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Makarnalı Dana Güveç and Biber Biftek.
Makarnalı Dana Güveç has less energy per 100 g (132 kcal versus 145 kcal).
For measured PUFA 18:3, Makarnalı Dana Güveç has 0.03 g and Biber Biftek has 0.29 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Makarnalı Dana Güveç 49, Biber Biftek 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.