Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
226 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Barbekü Et has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
133 vs 226(+69.9%)
Score Diff
36 vs 41(+13.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Barbekü Et
Higher energy
Barbekü Et
Score leader
Barbekü Et
Nutrient split
13 - 39 (tie: 13)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Güveç, Domuz, Makarnalı and Barbekü Et are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Güveç, Domuz, Makarnalı has 133.0 kcal and Barbekü Et has 226.0 kcal. The difference is 93.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 36 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Güveç | Barbekü Et | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 65 µg | 6 µg | -90.8% |
| Alfa Karoten | 259 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.23 mg | 0.26 mg | +13.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.28 µg | 0.92 µg | +228.6% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.16 mg | 0.23 mg | +43.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.28 mg | +55.6% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.1 mg | +11.1% |
| Besin folati | 8 µg | 3 µg | -62.5% |
| Beta Karoten | 643 µg | 40 µg | -93.8% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 2 µg | 1 µg | -50.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | 0.2 mg | -94.3% |
| D Vitamini | 0.4 µg | 0.6 µg | +50.0% |
| Demir | 0.95 mg | 1.36 mg | +43.2% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 0.3 g | -72.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.14 mg | 0.36 mg | +157.1% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 133 kj | 226 kj | +69.9% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 36 µg | 3 µg | -91.7% |
| Folik asit | 16 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 88 mg | 158 mg | +79.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.7 µg | 0.8 µg | -70.4% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 23 mg | +43.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.81 g | 12.23 g | +13.1% |
| Kolesterol | 29 mg | 65 mg | +124.1% |
| Likopen | 270 µg | 1365 µg | +405.6% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 80 µg | 26 µg | -67.5% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 19 mg | +18.8% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.12 g | 0.28 g | +133.3% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.25 g | 4.55 g | +102.2% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0.07 g | +75.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.87 mg | 3.2 mg | +71.1% |
| Potasyum | 183 mg | 289 mg | +57.9% |
| Protein | 9.35 g | 18.14 g | +94.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.63 g | 1.22 g | +93.7% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.03 g | 0.06 g | +100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.03 g | 0.06 g | +100.0% |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 2 µg | +100.0% |
| Selenyum | 19.2 µg | 23.9 µg | +24.5% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.07 g | 0.18 g | +157.1% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.23 g | 2.42 g | +96.7% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.67 g | 1.34 g | +100.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 296 mg | 601 mg | +103.0% |
| Su | 72.61 g | 55.89 g | -23.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.02 g | 4.02 g | +99.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 24 µg | 3 µg | -87.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 35.2 mg | 72.7 mg | +106.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.42 g | 4.93 g | +103.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.58 g | 11.17 g | +100.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | 1.39 g | +93.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.92 g | 9.97 g | +983.7% |
| Çinko | 1.66 mg | 3.51 mg | +111.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Güveç, Domuz, Makarnalı and Barbekü Et.
Güveç has less energy per 100 g (133 kcal versus 226 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Güveç has 0.92 g and Barbekü Et has 9.97 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Güveç 36, Barbekü Et 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.