Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Abiyuch, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 69(+21.1%)
Score Diff
31 vs 57(+83.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Higher energy
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Score leader
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Nutrient split
8 - 17 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ and Abiyuch, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ has 57.0 kcal and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
27 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Üzüm - Çiğ | Abiyuch, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 67 iu | 100 iu | +49.3% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 3 µg | 5 µg | +66.7% |
| Alfa Karoten | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.06 mg | -50.0% |
| Besin folati | 2 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 39 µg | 60 µg | +53.8% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6.5 mg | 54.1 mg | +732.3% |
| Demir | 0.26 mg | 1.61 mg | +519.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.9 g | 5.3 g | +35.9% |
| Enerji | 57 kj | 290 kj | +408.8% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 47 mg | +95.8% |
| Fruktoz | 3.92 g | 3.8 g | -3.1% |
| Galaktoz | — | 0 g | — |
| Glikoz | 3.67 g | 4.5 g | +22.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 37 mg | 8 mg | -78.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.93 g | 17.6 g | +26.3% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | 0.9 g | +80.0% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 64 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 14 mg | 24 mg | +71.4% |
| Maltoz | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Mangan | 1.97 mg | 0.18 mg | -90.9% |
| Potasyum | 203 mg | 304 mg | +49.8% |
| Protein | 0.81 g | 1.5 g | +85.2% |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0.57 g | 0.05 g | -91.2% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 20 mg | +1900.0% |
| Su | 84.29 g | 79.9 g | -5.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 2 µg | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.47 g | 0.1 g | -78.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 8.55 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.11 mg | 0.31 mg | +181.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Üzüm, Muscadine, Çiğ and Abiyuch, Çiğ.
Üzüm - Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 69 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Üzüm - Çiğ has 1 mg and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 20 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Üzüm - Çiğ 31, Abiyuch, Çiğ 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.