Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
406 kcal
Score
7 / 100
Graham Kraker has a higher nutrition quality score (11) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
430 vs 406(-5.6%)
Score Diff
11 vs 7(-36.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Graham Kraker
Higher energy
Graham Kraker
Score leader
Graham Kraker
Nutrient split
23 - 24 (tie: 18)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Graham Kraker and Marie Bisküvi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Graham Kraker has 430.0 kcal and Marie Bisküvi has 406.0 kcal. The difference is 24.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 7. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Graham Kraker | Marie Bisküvi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.27 mg | 0.54 mg | +100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0.19 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.49 mg | +53.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | 0.07 mg | -56.3% |
| Bakir | 0.17 mg | 0.1 mg | -41.2% |
| Besin folati | 19 µg | 20 µg | +5.3% |
| Beta Karoten | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 3.78 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.4 g | 3.5 g | +2.9% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.51 mg | 0.45 mg | -70.2% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 430 kj | 406 kj | -5.6% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 142 µg | 186 µg | +31.0% |
| Folik asit | 72 µg | 98 µg | +36.1% |
| Fosfor | 185 mg | 193 mg | +4.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 14.3 µg | 3.8 µg | -73.4% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 77 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 77.66 g | 70.54 g | -9.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 77 µg | 12 µg | -84.4% |
| Magnezyum | 40 mg | 28 mg | -30.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.46 g | 2.68 g | +8.9% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.44 mg | 3.86 mg | -13.1% |
| Potasyum | 170 mg | 307 mg | +80.6% |
| Protein | 6.69 g | 7.05 g | +5.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 4.76 g | 1.55 g | -67.4% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.62 g | 0.12 g | -80.6% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 6.3 µg | 23.9 µg | +279.4% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.23 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 2.95 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 1.03 g | +10200.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.06 g | 0.65 g | -38.7% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.47 g | 0.2 g | -57.4% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.21 g | — |
| Sodyum | 516 mg | 370 mg | -28.3% |
| Su | 3.39 g | 9.79 g | +188.8% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.63 g | 5.29 g | +224.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 91 µg | 118 µg | +29.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 5.9 mg | 27 mg | +357.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.51 g | 2.69 g | +7.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 10.6 g | 10.58 g | -0.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.39 g | 1.67 g | -69.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 24.85 g | 21.16 g | -14.8% |
| Çinko | 0.96 mg | 0.61 mg | -36.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Graham Kraker and Marie Bisküvi.
Marie Bisküvi has less energy per 100 g (406 kcal versus 430 kcal).
For measured SFA 14:0, Graham Kraker has 0.01 g and Marie Bisküvi has 1.03 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Graham Kraker 11, Marie Bisküvi 7.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.