Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
136 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Ördek ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
379 vs 136(-64.1%)
Score Diff
27 vs 71(+163.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ördek ciğeri
Higher energy
Glutensiz yulaf
Score leader
Ördek ciğeri
Nutrient split
5 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Glutensiz yulaf and Ördek ciğeri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Glutensiz yulaf has 379.0 kcal and Ördek ciğeri has 136.0 kcal. The difference is 243.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Glutensiz yulaf | Ördek ciğeri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 11984 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.46 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 54 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 0.89 mg | +790.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.62 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.39 mg | 5.9 mg | +1412.8% |
| Beta-glukan | 4 g | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.25 mg | 30.5 mg | +617.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.1 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 738 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 299 mg | -27.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 52 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.7 g | 3.5 g | -94.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 515 mg | — |
| Magnezyum | 138 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 3.63 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.1 mg | 7.89 mg | +617.3% |
| Potasyum | 362 mg | 230 mg | -36.5% |
| Protein | 13.15 g | 18.7 g | +42.2% |
| Selenyum | — | 68 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 140 mg | +6900.0% |
| Su | 8.2 g | 73.8 g | +800.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.11 g | 1.4 g | +26.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.18 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.52 g | 4.3 g | -34.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.54 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.64 mg | 3.1 mg | -14.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Glutensiz yulaf and Ördek ciğeri.
Ördek ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (136 kcal versus 379 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Glutensiz yulaf has 2 mg and Ördek ciğeri has 140 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Glutensiz yulaf 27, Ördek ciğeri 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.