Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
628 kcal
Score
21 / 100
Glutensiz yulaf has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
379 vs 628(+65.7%)
Score Diff
27 vs 21(-22.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Glutensiz yulaf
Higher energy
Marcona bademi
Score leader
Glutensiz yulaf
Nutrient split
6 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Glutensiz yulaf and Marcona bademi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Glutensiz yulaf has 379.0 kcal and Marcona bademi has 628.0 kcal. The difference is 249.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 21. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Glutensiz yulaf | Marcona bademi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.46 mg | 0.21 mg | -54.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.1 mg | 1.01 mg | +910.0% |
| Bakir | 0.39 mg | 1 mg | +156.4% |
| Beta-glukan | 4 g | — | — |
| Demir | 4.25 mg | 3.7 mg | -12.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.1 g | 10.5 g | +4.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 25.6 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 480 mg | +17.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 52 mg | 264 mg | +407.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.7 g | 17.8 g | -73.7% |
| Kül | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 138 mg | 270 mg | +95.7% |
| Mangan | 3.63 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.1 mg | 3.6 mg | +227.3% |
| Potasyum | 362 mg | 705 mg | +94.8% |
| Protein | 13.15 g | 19.5 g | +48.3% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 1 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 8.2 g | 3.5 g | -57.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.11 g | 4.6 g | +314.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | 44 µg | +37.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.18 g | 36.8 g | +1588.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.52 g | 56.2 g | +762.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.54 g | 12.4 g | +388.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.64 mg | 3.1 mg | -14.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Glutensiz yulaf and Marcona bademi.
Glutensiz yulaf has less energy per 100 g (379 kcal versus 628 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Glutensiz yulaf has 2.18 g and Marcona bademi has 36.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Glutensiz yulaf 27, Marcona bademi 21.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.