Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
32 vs 81(+153.1%)
Score Diff
100 vs 62(-38.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Araka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 32.0 kcal and Araka has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 49.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Araka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 450 µg | 38 µg | -91.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.266 mg | +232.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 0.132 mg | -12.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.169 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 5400 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 35 mg | 40 mg | +14.3% |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 1.47 mg | -41.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 5.7 g | +103.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 32 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 80 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 50 mg | 108 mg | +116.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 350 µg | 24.8 µg | -92.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 25 mg | -77.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.1 g | 14.45 g | +183.3% |
| Kül | 1.6 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 45 mg | 33 mg | -26.7% |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 2.09 mg | +248.3% |
| Potasyum | 420 mg | 244 mg | -41.9% |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 5.42 g | +125.8% |
| Sodyum | 25 mg | 5 mg | -80.0% |
| Su | 89.5 g | 78.86 g | -11.9% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 65 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 5.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 1.24 mg | +106.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) and Araka.
Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 0.6 mg and Araka has 2.09 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Gelincik Otu (Organik/Köy Usulü) 100, Araka 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.