Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
116 kcal
Score
67 / 100
Çiğ Bizon Antrikot has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
114 vs 116(+1.8%)
Score Diff
41 vs 67(+63.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çiğ Bizon Antrikot
Higher energy
Çiğ Bizon Antrikot
Score leader
Çiğ Bizon Antrikot
Nutrient split
28 - 21 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Av Eti, Antelope, Çiğ and Çiğ Bizon Antrikot are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Av Eti, Antelope, Çiğ has 114.0 kcal and Çiğ Bizon Antrikot has 116.0 kcal. The difference is 2.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 67. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
51 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Av Eti - Çiğ | Çiğ Bizon Antrikot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 3 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Alanin | 1.3 g | 1.26 g | -3.1% |
| Arjinin | 1.47 g | 1.31 g | -10.9% |
| Aspartik asit | 2.12 g | 1.92 g | -9.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.32 mg | 0.05 mg | -84.4% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 2.2 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.58 mg | 0.09 mg | -84.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.18 mg | 0.13 mg | -27.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 3.19 mg | 2.8 mg | -12.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Enerji | 114 kj | 116 kj | +1.8% |
| Fenilalanin | 0.89 g | 0.83 g | -6.7% |
| Fosfor | 188 mg | 198 mg | +5.3% |
| Gama tokoferol | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| Glisin | 1 g | 1.06 g | +6.0% |
| Glutamik asit | 3.37 g | 3.22 g | -4.5% |
| Histidin | 1.06 g | 0.59 g | -44.3% |
| Izolosin | 0.86 g | 0.93 g | +8.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 3 mg | 6 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 95 mg | 62 mg | -34.7% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | 1.2 g | +9.1% |
| Lizin | 1.87 g | 1.72 g | -8.0% |
| Losin | 1.89 g | 1.72 g | -9.0% |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 24 mg | -11.1% |
| Mangan | 0.02 mg | 0.01 mg | -50.0% |
| Metiyonin | 0.64 g | 0.52 g | -18.8% |
| MUFA 14:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | 0.05 g | +400.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.48 g | 0.92 g | +91.7% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.84 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 353 mg | 344 mg | -2.5% |
| Prolin | 1.02 g | 0.88 g | -13.7% |
| Protein | 22.38 g | 22.1 g | -1.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.25 g | 0.18 g | -28.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.07 g | 0.01 g | -85.7% |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 9.7 µg | 23.3 µg | +140.2% |
| Serin | 0.95 g | 0.84 g | -11.6% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0.03 g | +50.0% |
| SFA 15:0 | — | 0.05 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.34 g | 0.36 g | +5.9% |
| SFA 17:0 | — | 0.03 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.37 g | 0.4 g | +8.1% |
| SFA 22:0 | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Sistin | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 51 mg | 48 mg | -5.9% |
| Su | 74.08 g | 74 g | -0.1% |
| Tirozin | 0.78 g | 0.71 g | -9.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.74 g | 0.9 g | +21.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.48 g | 1 g | +108.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.03 g | 2.4 g | +18.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.44 g | 0.19 g | -56.8% |
| Treonin | 1.03 g | 0.91 g | -11.7% |
| Triptofan | — | 0 g | — |
| Valin | 0.99 g | 1 g | +1.0% |
| Çinko | 1.28 mg | 3.2 mg | +150.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Av Eti, Antelope, Çiğ and Çiğ Bizon Antrikot.
Av Eti - Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (114 kcal versus 116 kcal).
For measured MUFA 16:1, Av Eti - Çiğ has 0.01 g and Çiğ Bizon Antrikot has 0.05 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Av Eti - Çiğ 41, Çiğ Bizon Antrikot 67.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.