Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
175 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Furikake has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
425 vs 175(-58.8%)
Score Diff
29 vs 27(-6.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Furikake
Higher energy
Furikake
Score leader
Furikake
Nutrient split
13 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Furikake and Akasya lifi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Furikake has 425.0 kcal and Akasya lifi has 175.0 kcal. The difference is 250.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Furikake | Akasya lifi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 145 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 0.15 mg | -82.4% |
| Demir | 7.8 mg | 1.2 mg | -84.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.4 g | 85 g | +804.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.6 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 732 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 175 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 88 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 420 mg | 35 mg | -91.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 740 mg | 950 mg | +28.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 33.2 g | 85 g | +156.0% |
| Kül | 14.8 g | 3.3 g | -77.7% |
| Magnezyum | 195 mg | 110 mg | -43.6% |
| Mangan | 1.45 mg | 0.2 mg | -86.2% |
| Niasin | 4.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 580 mg | 480 mg | -17.2% |
| Protein | 24.5 g | 2.1 g | -91.4% |
| Selenyum | 18.6 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 3850 mg | 85 mg | -97.8% |
| Su | 4.3 g | 9.5 g | +120.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.4 g | 0.02 g | -99.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 22.8 g | 0.1 g | -99.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 13.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 3.4 mg | 0.4 mg | -88.2% |
| Çözünmeyen lif | — | 0.5 g | — |
| Çözünür lif | — | 84.5 g | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Furikake and Akasya lifi.
Akasya lifi has less energy per 100 g (175 kcal versus 425 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Furikake has 9.4 g and Akasya lifi has 85 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Furikake 29, Akasya lifi 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.