Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
28 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Frenk turpu and Afrika patlıcanı have the same nutrition score (100).
Energy Diff
16 vs 28(+75.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 100(0.0%)
Higher energy
Afrika patlıcanı
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Frenk turpu and Afrika patlıcanı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Frenk turpu has 16.0 kcal and Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Frenk turpu | Afrika patlıcanı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 5 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | 0.05 mg | +316.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.039 mg | 0.04 mg | +2.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.071 mg | 0.08 mg | +12.7% |
| Bakir | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 60 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 14.8 mg | 5 mg | -66.2% |
| Demir | 0.34 mg | 0.6 mg | +76.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 2.5 g | +56.2% |
| Enerji | — | 117 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 22 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 24 mg | +20.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 18 mg | -28.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.4 g | 5.9 g | +73.5% |
| Kül | 0.55 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 16 mg | +60.0% |
| Mangan | 0.069 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.254 mg | 0.6 mg | +136.2% |
| Potasyum | 233 mg | 230 mg | -1.3% |
| Protein | 0.68 g | 1.2 g | +76.5% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 3 mg | -92.3% |
| Su | 95.27 g | 91.2 g | -4.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 25 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.2 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.28 mg | 0.17 mg | -39.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Frenk turpu and Afrika patlıcanı.
Frenk turpu has less energy per 100 g (16 kcal versus 28 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Frenk turpu has 0.012 mg and Afrika patlıcanı has 0.05 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Frenk turpu 100, Afrika patlıcanı 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.