Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
15 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Frenk turpu and Acur have the same nutrition score (100).
Energy Diff
16 vs 15(-6.3%)
Score Diff
100 vs 100(0.0%)
Higher energy
Frenk turpu
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
13 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Frenk turpu and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Frenk turpu has 16.0 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Frenk turpu | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | 0.027 mg | +125.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.039 mg | 0.033 mg | -15.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.071 mg | 0.04 mg | -43.7% |
| Bakir | 0.05 mg | 0.041 mg | -18.0% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 45 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 14.8 mg | 2.8 mg | -81.1% |
| Demir | 0.34 mg | 0.28 mg | -17.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 0.5 g | -68.8% |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 24 mg | +20.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.3 µg | 16.4 µg | +1161.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 16 mg | -36.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.4 g | 3.63 g | +6.8% |
| Kül | 0.55 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 13 mg | +30.0% |
| Mangan | 0.069 mg | 0.079 mg | +14.5% |
| Niasin | 0.254 mg | 0.098 mg | -61.4% |
| Potasyum | 233 mg | 147 mg | -36.9% |
| Protein | 0.68 g | 0.65 g | -4.4% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 2 mg | -94.9% |
| Su | 95.27 g | 95.23 g | -0.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 25 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.11 g | +10.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.28 mg | 0.2 mg | -28.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Frenk turpu and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 16 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Frenk turpu has 1.3 µg and Acur has 16.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Frenk turpu 100, Acur 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.