Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) has a higher nutrition quality score (73) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
333 vs 324.2(-2.6%)
Score Diff
73 vs 55(-24.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu)
Higher energy
Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu)
Score leader
Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu)
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) has 333.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 8.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 73 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 22 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.383 mg | 0.08 mg | -79.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.379 mg | 0.09 mg | -76.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.435 mg | 0.22 mg | -49.4% |
| Bakir | 0.91 mg | 0.35 mg | -61.5% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21 mg | 52 mg | +147.6% |
| Demir | 16.23 mg | 24.5 mg | +51.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 38 g | 12.8 g | -66.3% |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 568 mg | 75 mg | -86.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 689 mg | 180 mg | -73.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.9 g | 80.2 g | +60.7% |
| Kül | 5.87 g | 5.3 g | -9.7% |
| Magnezyum | 258 mg | 82 mg | -68.2% |
| Mangan | 1.3 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 3.63 mg | 1.4 mg | -61.4% |
| Potasyum | 1351 mg | 640 mg | -52.6% |
| Protein | 19.77 g | 3.2 g | -83.8% |
| Sodyum | 17 mg | 35 mg | +105.9% |
| Su | 9.87 g | 9.5 g | -3.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.62 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 10 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.13 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.59 g | 1.8 g | -87.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.28 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.64 g | 21.4 g | +3243.7% |
| Çinko | 5.5 mg | 1.1 mg | -80.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) and Amchur.
Amchur has less energy per 100 g (324.2 kcal versus 333 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) has 0.64 g and Amchur has 21.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Frenk Kimyonu (Karaman Kimyonu) 73, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.