Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
90 vs 41(-54.4%)
Score Diff
47 vs 44(-6.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates
Higher energy
Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates
Score leader
Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates and Havuç are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates has 90.0 kcal and Havuç has 41.0 kcal. The difference is 49.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 47 and 44. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates | Havuç | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 961 µg | 835 µg | -13.1% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 3477 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.29 mg | 0.138 mg | -52.4% |
| Bakir | 0.16 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 11500 µg | 8285 µg | -28.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 19.6 mg | 5.9 mg | -69.9% |
| Demir | 0.69 mg | 0.3 mg | -56.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.3 g | 2.8 g | -15.2% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 90 kcal | 41 kcal | -54.4% |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | 19 µg | +216.7% |
| Fosfor | 54 mg | 35 mg | -35.2% |
| Fruktoz | — | 0.59 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 1.94 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 13.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 38 mg | 33 mg | -13.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.71 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 9.61 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 12 mg | -55.6% |
| Mangan | 0.5 mg | 0.141 mg | -71.8% |
| Niasin | 1.49 mg | 0.983 mg | -34.0% |
| Potasyum | 475 mg | 320 mg | -32.6% |
| Protein | 2.01 g | 0.93 g | -53.7% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 2.29 g | — |
| Sodyum | 36 mg | 69 mg | +91.7% |
| Su | 75.8 g | 88.29 g | +16.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.15 g | 0.24 g | +60.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.48 g | 4.74 g | -26.9% |
| Çinko | 0.32 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates and Havuç.
Havuç has less energy per 100 g (41 kcal versus 90 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates has 6 µg and Havuç has 19 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Fırınlanmış Tatlı Patates 47, Havuç 44.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.