Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
628 vs 654(+4.1%)
Score Diff
17 vs 15(-11.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz)
Higher energy
Ceviz
Score leader
Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz)
Nutrient split
11 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) and Ceviz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) has 628.0 kcal and Ceviz has 654.0 kcal. The difference is 26.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 15. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) | Ceviz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.643 mg | 0.34 mg | -47.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.53 mg | — |
| Bakir | 1.725 mg | 1.58 mg | -8.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.3 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.7 mg | 2.91 mg | -38.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.7 g | 6.7 g | -30.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 15.03 mg | 0.7 mg | -95.3% |
| Enerji | 2627 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 628 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 113 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 310 mg | 346 mg | +11.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 2.7 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 114 mg | 98 mg | -14.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.7 g | 13.71 g | -17.9% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 163 mg | 158 mg | -3.1% |
| Mangan | 6.175 mg | 3.41 mg | -44.8% |
| Niasin | — | 1.12 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 680 mg | 441 mg | -35.1% |
| Protein | 14.95 g | 15.23 g | +1.9% |
| Selenyum | 2.4 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 0 mg | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 5.31 g | 4.07 g | -23.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 98 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 60.75 g | 65.21 g | +7.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.34 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.45 mg | 3.09 mg | +26.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) and Ceviz.
Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) has less energy per 100 g (628 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) has 15.03 mg and Ceviz has 0.7 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Fındık (Kavrulmuş, Tuzsuz) 17, Ceviz 15.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.