Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
47 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Ferik elması and Akça armudu have the same nutrition score (100).
Energy Diff
52 vs 47(-9.6%)
Score Diff
100 vs 100(0.0%)
Higher energy
Ferik elması
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
8 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ferik elması and Akça armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ferik elması has 52.0 kcal and Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ferik elması | Akça armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.017 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.041 mg | 0.028 mg | -31.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.082 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 27 µg | 14 µg | -48.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.6 mg | 4.3 mg | -6.5% |
| Demir | 0.12 mg | 0.18 mg | +50.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 2.8 g | +16.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 47 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 3 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 11 mg | 0.0% |
| Fruktoz | 5.9 g | 6.2 g | +5.1% |
| Glikoz | 2.4 g | 2.8 g | +16.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.2 µg | 4.4 µg | +100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 9 mg | +50.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.81 g | 12.4 g | -10.2% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 5 mg | 7 mg | +40.0% |
| Malik asit | 460 mg | 250 mg | -45.7% |
| Potasyum | 107 mg | 116 mg | +8.4% |
| Protein | 0.26 g | 0.38 g | +46.2% |
| Sakkaroz | 2.07 g | 1.2 g | -42.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 85.56 g | 85.5 g | -0.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.17 g | 0.12 g | -29.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.39 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.04 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ferik elması and Akça armudu.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 52 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Ferik elması has 2.2 µg and Akça armudu has 4.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ferik elması 100, Akça armudu 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.