Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Fennel pollen has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
338 vs 337(-0.3%)
Score Diff
71 vs 66(-7.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Fennel pollen
Higher energy
Fennel pollen
Score leader
Fennel pollen
Nutrient split
13 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Fennel pollen and Anason Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Fennel pollen has 338.0 kcal and Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Fennel pollen | Anason Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 75 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.42 mg | 0.34 mg | -19.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.38 mg | 0.29 mg | -23.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.72 mg | 0.65 mg | -9.7% |
| Bakir | 1.15 mg | 0.91 mg | -20.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 890 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 28 mg | 21 mg | -25.0% |
| Demir | 16.5 mg | 36.96 mg | +124.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 22.5 g | 14.6 g | -35.1% |
| Folat DFE | 145 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 440 mg | +12.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 950 mg | 646 mg | -32.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52.3 g | 50.02 g | -4.4% |
| Kül | 6.8 g | 7.04 g | +3.5% |
| Magnezyum | 260 mg | 170 mg | -34.6% |
| Mangan | 4.6 mg | 2.3 mg | -50.0% |
| Niasin | 5.2 mg | 3.06 mg | -41.2% |
| Potasyum | 1450 mg | 1441 mg | -0.6% |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 17.6 g | +4.8% |
| Sodyum | 65 mg | 16 mg | -75.4% |
| Su | 9.2 g | 9.54 g | +3.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.59 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.78 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.4 g | 15.9 g | +114.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.15 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 16.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.8 mg | 5.3 mg | +39.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Fennel pollen and Anason Tohumu.
Anason Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 338 kcal).
For measured Demir, Fennel pollen has 16.5 mg and Anason Tohumu has 36.96 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Fennel pollen 71, Anason Tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.