Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
127 kcal
Score
25 / 100
Tabbouleh has a higher nutrition quality score (25) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
291 vs 127(-56.4%)
Score Diff
16 vs 25(+56.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tabbouleh
Higher energy
Empanada
Score leader
Tabbouleh
Nutrient split
42 - 12 (tie: 11)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Empanada and Tabbouleh are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Empanada has 291.0 kcal and Tabbouleh has 127.0 kcal. The difference is 164.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 25. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Empanada | Tabbouleh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 16 µg | 33 µg | +106.3% |
| Alfa Karoten | 12 µg | 23 µg | +91.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.04 mg | -75.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.32 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.03 mg | -75.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.07 mg | -41.7% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.06 mg | -33.3% |
| Besin folati | 16 µg | 20 µg | +25.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 51 µg | 389 µg | +662.7% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 12 µg | 1 µg | -91.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | 15.8 mg | +351.4% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.62 mg | 0.74 mg | -54.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2 g | 1.8 g | -10.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.35 mg | 2.18 mg | +522.9% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 291 kj | 127 kj | -56.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 53 µg | 20 µg | -62.3% |
| Folik asit | 22 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 95 mg | 39 mg | -58.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.7 µg | 97.6 µg | +1976.6% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 20 mg | -57.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 29.91 g | 9.65 g | -67.7% |
| Kolesterol | 13 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Likopen | 258 µg | 590 µg | +128.7% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 83 µg | 387 µg | +366.3% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 22 mg | +22.2% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.28 g | 0.1 g | -64.3% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.82 g | 6.34 g | -7.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.08 g | 0.03 g | -62.5% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.41 mg | 0.7 mg | -71.0% |
| Potasyum | 176 mg | 154 mg | -12.5% |
| Protein | 7.19 g | 1.64 g | -77.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.61 g | 0.91 g | -43.5% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.08 g | 0.07 g | -12.5% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 11 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 6.6 µg | 0.3 µg | -95.5% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.03 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.05 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 3.19 g | 1.18 g | -63.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.88 g | 0.25 g | -86.7% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 446 mg | 495 mg | +11.0% |
| Su | 45.27 g | 77.32 g | +70.8% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.66 g | 1.5 g | -73.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 38 µg | 20 µg | -47.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | 19.7 mg | 5.9 mg | -70.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.14 g | 6.48 g | -9.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 16 g | 9.66 g | -39.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 0.97 g | -44.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.75 g | 1.34 g | -51.3% |
| Çinko | 1.14 mg | 0.3 mg | -73.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Empanada and Tabbouleh.
Tabbouleh has less energy per 100 g (127 kcal versus 291 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Empanada has 4.7 µg and Tabbouleh has 97.6 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Empanada 16, Tabbouleh 25.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.