Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
267 kcal
Score
15 / 100
Ekmek has a higher nutrition quality score (15) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
248 vs 267(+7.7%)
Score Diff
11 vs 15(+36.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ekmek
Higher energy
Ekmek
Score leader
Ekmek
Nutrient split
14 - 26 (tie: 25)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ekmek, Pilav and Ekmek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ekmek, Pilav has 248.0 kcal and Ekmek has 267.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 15. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ekmek, Pilav | Ekmek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.38 mg | 0.51 mg | +34.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.51 mg | 0.24 mg | -52.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0.09 mg | +28.6% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.12 mg | +71.4% |
| Besin folati | 36 µg | 25 µg | -30.6% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.63 mg | 3.36 mg | +27.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 4.3 g | 2.3 g | -46.5% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.6 mg | 0.22 mg | -63.3% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 248 kj | 267 kj | +7.7% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 36 µg | 171 µg | +375.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 86 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 51 mg | 113 mg | +121.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.3 µg | 0.2 µg | -33.3% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 138 mg | 211 mg | +52.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 45.78 g | 49.2 g | +7.5% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 44 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 27 mg | +125.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.27 g | 0.71 g | -44.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.77 mg | 4.76 mg | +71.8% |
| Potasyum | 75 mg | 117 mg | +56.0% |
| Protein | 4.31 g | 9.43 g | +118.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.5 g | 1.68 g | +236.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.01 g | 0.2 g | +1900.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0.4 µg | 23.2 µg | +5700.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.04 g | 0.01 g | -75.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.71 g | 0.49 g | -31.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.15 g | 0.25 g | +66.7% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| Sodyum | 447 mg | 450 mg | +0.7% |
| Su | 42.99 g | 35.7 g | -17.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.98 g | 0.82 g | -16.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 36 µg | 111 µg | +208.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 12.6 mg | 14.6 mg | +15.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.01 g | 0.72 g | -64.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.24 g | 3.59 g | -31.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.52 g | 1.87 g | +259.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.53 g | 5.34 g | +51.3% |
| Çinko | 0.48 mg | 0.88 mg | +83.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ekmek, Pilav and Ekmek.
Ekmek, Pilav has less energy per 100 g (248 kcal versus 267 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Ekmek, Pilav has 0.4 µg and Ekmek has 23.2 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ekmek, Pilav 11, Ekmek 15.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.