Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Küba Ekmek has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
272 vs 293(+7.7%)
Score Diff
17 vs 15(-11.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Küba Ekmek
Higher energy
Ekmek
Score leader
Küba Ekmek
Nutrient split
16 - 24 (tie: 25)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Küba Ekmek and Ekmek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Küba Ekmek has 272.0 kcal and Ekmek has 293.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 15. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Küba Ekmek | Ekmek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.71 mg | 0.45 mg | -36.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.43 mg | 0.26 mg | -39.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.11 mg | 0.1 mg | -9.1% |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.14 mg | -6.7% |
| Besin folati | 28 µg | 23 µg | -17.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 3.91 mg | 3.69 mg | -5.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 2.5 g | +13.6% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.21 mg | 0.24 mg | +14.3% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 272 kj | 293 kj | +7.7% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 189 µg | 160 µg | -15.3% |
| Folik asit | 95 µg | 80 µg | -15.8% |
| Fosfor | 105 mg | 124 mg | +18.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.7 µg | 0.2 µg | -71.4% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 52 mg | 232 mg | +346.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 51.88 g | 54.07 g | +4.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 45 µg | 46 µg | +2.2% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 30 mg | -6.3% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.34 g | 0.78 g | +129.4% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.82 mg | 5.23 mg | +8.5% |
| Potasyum | 117 mg | 129 mg | +10.3% |
| Protein | 10.75 g | 10.36 g | -3.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.79 g | 1.85 g | +134.2% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.06 g | 0.22 g | +266.7% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 28.6 µg | 25.5 µg | -10.8% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.36 g | 0.54 g | +50.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.14 g | 0.28 g | +100.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 602 mg | 495 mg | -17.8% |
| Su | 33 g | 29.34 g | -11.1% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.53 g | 0.9 g | +69.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 123 µg | 104 µg | -15.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | 8 mg | 16 mg | +100.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.36 g | 0.79 g | +119.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.42 g | 3.94 g | +62.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 2.06 g | +142.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.62 g | 5.87 g | +27.1% |
| Çinko | 1.04 mg | 0.97 mg | -6.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Küba Ekmek and Ekmek.
Küba Ekmek has less energy per 100 g (272 kcal versus 293 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Küba Ekmek has 52 mg and Ekmek has 232 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Küba Ekmek 17, Ekmek 15.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.