Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ekmek has a higher nutrition quality score (15) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
267 vs 326(+22.1%)
Score Diff
15 vs 9(-40.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ekmek
Higher energy
Ekmek, Paratha
Score leader
Ekmek
Nutrient split
20 - 24 (tie: 21)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ekmek and Ekmek, Paratha are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ekmek has 267.0 kcal and Ekmek, Paratha has 326.0 kcal. The difference is 59.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 15 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ekmek | Ekmek, Paratha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.51 mg | 0.09 mg | -82.4% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.08 mg | -66.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.09 mg | 0.08 mg | -11.1% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.15 mg | +25.0% |
| Besin folati | 25 µg | 8 µg | -68.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 3.36 mg | 1.61 mg | -52.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 9.6 g | +317.4% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.22 mg | 1.35 mg | +513.6% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 267 kj | 326 kj | +22.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 171 µg | 8 µg | -95.3% |
| Folik asit | 86 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 113 mg | 120 mg | +6.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.2 µg | 3.4 µg | +1600.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 211 mg | 25 mg | -88.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.2 g | 45.35 g | -7.8% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 1 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 44 µg | 11 µg | -75.0% |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 37 mg | +37.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.02 g | 0.02 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.71 g | 3.79 g | +433.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.03 g | +200.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.76 mg | 1.83 mg | -61.6% |
| Potasyum | 117 mg | 139 mg | +18.8% |
| Protein | 9.43 g | 6.36 g | -32.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.68 g | 2.41 g | +43.5% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.2 g | 0.07 g | -65.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 23.2 µg | 7.1 µg | -69.4% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.05 g | +400.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 0.11 g | +1000.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.49 g | 4.9 g | +900.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.25 g | 0.64 g | +156.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 450 mg | 452 mg | +0.4% |
| Su | 35.7 g | 33.5 g | -6.2% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 5.83 g | +611.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 111 µg | 8 µg | -92.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | 14.6 mg | 6.3 mg | -56.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | 3.84 g | +433.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.59 g | 13.2 g | +267.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | 2.48 g | +32.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.34 g | 4.15 g | -22.3% |
| Çinko | 0.88 mg | 0.82 mg | -6.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ekmek and Ekmek, Paratha.
Ekmek has less energy per 100 g (267 kcal versus 326 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Ekmek has 0.2 µg and Ekmek, Paratha has 3.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ekmek 15, Ekmek, Paratha 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.