Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
272 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Küba Ekmek has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
267 vs 272(+1.9%)
Score Diff
15 vs 17(+13.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Küba Ekmek
Higher energy
Küba Ekmek
Score leader
Küba Ekmek
Nutrient split
20 - 19 (tie: 26)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ekmek and Küba Ekmek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ekmek has 267.0 kcal and Küba Ekmek has 272.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 15 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ekmek | Küba Ekmek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.51 mg | 0.71 mg | +39.2% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.43 mg | +79.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.09 mg | 0.11 mg | +22.2% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.15 mg | +25.0% |
| Besin folati | 25 µg | 28 µg | +12.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 3.36 mg | 3.91 mg | +16.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 2.2 g | -4.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.22 mg | 0.21 mg | -4.5% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 267 kj | 272 kj | +1.9% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 171 µg | 189 µg | +10.5% |
| Folik asit | 86 µg | 95 µg | +10.5% |
| Fosfor | 113 mg | 105 mg | -7.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.2 µg | 0.7 µg | +250.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 211 mg | 52 mg | -75.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.2 g | 51.88 g | +5.4% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 44 µg | 45 µg | +2.3% |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 32 mg | +18.5% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.71 g | 0.34 g | -52.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.76 mg | 4.82 mg | +1.3% |
| Potasyum | 117 mg | 117 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 9.43 g | 10.75 g | +14.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.68 g | 0.79 g | -53.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.2 g | 0.06 g | -70.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 23.2 µg | 28.6 µg | +23.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.49 g | 0.36 g | -26.5% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.25 g | 0.14 g | -44.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 450 mg | 602 mg | +33.8% |
| Su | 35.7 g | 33 g | -7.6% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 0.53 g | -35.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 111 µg | 123 µg | +10.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | 14.6 mg | 8 mg | -45.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | 0.36 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.59 g | 2.42 g | -32.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.87 g | 0.85 g | -54.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.34 g | 4.62 g | -13.5% |
| Çinko | 0.88 mg | 1.04 mg | +18.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ekmek and Küba Ekmek.
Ekmek has less energy per 100 g (267 kcal versus 272 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Ekmek has 0.2 µg and Küba Ekmek has 0.7 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ekmek 15, Küba Ekmek 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.