Question 1

What is the main difference between Ekmek and Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek?

Accepted Answer

This comparison summarizes the key differences between Ekmek and Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek in terms of energy (kcal), nutrition quality score and micronutrient balance. Ekmek tends to have a relatively higher energy value, while Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek usually leads on the nutrition quality score side. Cards and charts on this page help you visually see in which context each food makes more sense.

Question 2

Which one is lower in calories and potentially better for a calorie-restricted diet?

Accepted Answer

Per 100 g, Ekmek provides fewer calories than the other option. If you are focusing on calorie control, keeping portions equal, Ekmek will usually fit more easily into your daily limits.

Question 3

In which situations should I prefer each of them?

Accepted Answer

If keeping total daily calories low is your main goal, you can prioritize the lower-calorie option as your default and use the other one in smaller portions. If you care more about nutrient density, the food with the higher quality score, Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek, can take a slightly larger role in your routine. Over the long term, rotating between similar foods is usually a good way to keep both taste and nutrient variety high.

Question 4

How do they compare in protein, fat and carbohydrates?

Accepted Answer

According to the nutrient comparison: B6 Vitamini: Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek leads significantly; Toplam yağ: Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek leads significantly; A Vitamini (IU): Ekmek leads significantly. The "Nutrients (per 100 g)" table on this page shows in detail which food leads in each nutrient. The one with higher protein may be more advantageous for muscle repair and satiety goals.

Question 5

Which is better for a weight loss diet?

Accepted Answer

In terms of calories, Ekmek provides fewer calories per portion, so you consume less energy for the same serving size. This is usually an advantage when aiming for weight loss. The one with the higher nutrition score, Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek, can help you get more vitamins and minerals for the same calories. Ideal strategy: Use the lower-calorie option as your main portion and add the other in smaller amounts for variety.

Question 6

Which is better after exercise or sports?

Accepted Answer

In terms of protein, Ekmek stands out. Since protein intake is important for muscle repair and recovery, Ekmek may be a better choice for post-workout meals. Also, the food with higher carbohydrates can help replenish muscle glycogen stores. Check the protein and carbohydrate values in the nutrient comparison on this page to decide.

Nutrients	Ekmek	Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek	Difference
A Vitamini (IU)	6 iu	0 iu	-100.0%
A Vitamini (RAE)	0 µg	0 µg	—
Alanin	0.27 g	0 g	-100.0%
Alfa tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Arjinin	0.33 g	0 g	-100.0%
Aspartik asit	0.43 g	0 g	-100.0%
B1 Vitamini (Tiamin)	0.35 mg	0.25 mg	-28.6%
B12 Vitamini	0.1 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin)	0.28 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
B6 Vitamini	0.04 mg	0.14 mg	+250.0%
Bakir	0.1 mg	0.11 mg	+10.0%
Besin folati	34 µg	31 µg	-8.8%
Beta tokoferol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Beta tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
C Vitamini (askorbik asit)	0.2 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Delta tokoferol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Delta tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Demir	2.3 mg	0.89 mg	-61.3%
Diyet lifi	0 g	2.9 g	—
E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol)	0 mg	0.52 mg	—
Enerji	879 kj	257 kj	-70.8%
Fenilalanin	0.38 g	0 g	-100.0%
Folat DFE	70 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Folik asit	21 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Fosfor	100 mg	128 mg	+28.0%
Fruktoz	0 g	1.55 g	—
Galaktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Gama tokoferol	0 mg	2.71 mg	—
Gama tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Glikoz	0 g	1.25 g	—
Glisin	0.28 g	0 g	-100.0%
Glutamik asit	2.23 g	0 g	-100.0%
Histidin	0.17 g	0 g	-100.0%
Izolosin	0.31 g	0 g	-100.0%
Kalsiyum	115 mg	41 mg	-64.3%
Karbonhidrat (farkla)	43.3 g	40.24 g	-7.1%
Kolesterol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Kül	1.6 g	1.31 g	-18.1%
Laktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Lizin	0.26 g	0 g	-100.0%
Losin	0.56 g	0 g	-100.0%
Magnezyum	24 mg	42 mg	+75.0%
Maltoz	0 g	0.18 g	—
Mangan	0.54 mg	0.67 mg	+24.1%
Metiyonin	0.14 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 16:1	0.04 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit)	0.78 g	0 g	-100.0%
Niasin	3.03 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Nisasta	0 g	34.3 g	—
Pantotenik asit	0.43 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Potasyum	124 mg	165 mg	+33.1%
Prolin	0.76 g	0 g	-100.0%
Protein	7.6 g	5.65 g	-25.7%
PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit)	1.29 g	0 g	-100.0%
PUFA 18:3	0.06 g	0 g	-100.0%
Retinol	0 µg	0 µg	—
Sakkaroz	0 g	0 g	—
Selenyum	23 µg	9.2 µg	-60.0%
Serin	0.38 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 10:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 12:0	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 14:0	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit)	0.5 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 18:0 (stearik asit)	0.04 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 4:0 (butirik asit)	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 6:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 8:0	0 g	0 g	—
Sistin	0.16 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sodyum	388 mg	544 mg	+40.2%
Su	44 g	44.6 g	+1.4%
Tirozin	0.25 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam doymus yağ asitleri	0.6 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam Folat	55 µg	31 µg	-43.6%
Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri	0.82 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam yağ	3.5 g	8.2 g	+134.3%
Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri	1.35 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam Şeker	0 g	2.98 g	—
Treonin	0.23 g	0 g	-100.0%
Triptofan	0.1 g	0 g	-100.0%
Valin	0.36 g	0 g	-100.0%
Çinko	0.83 mg	0.77 mg	-7.2%

Ekmek, Azaltılmış Kalorili, Yulaf vs Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek

Ekmek

Community Insights & Reviews

Ask Question or Rate

Recent Comments

Andrea'S, Glutensiz Yumuşak Ekmek

Comparison Analysis

Visual comparison

Energy and score summary

Nutrient profile (normalized radar)

Percentage difference map

Dynamic comparison article

Nutrients (per 100 g)

Comparison Analysis: FAQ

Comparison Results