Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (94) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 42(+50.0%)
Score Diff
94 vs 56(-40.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ebegümeci, Çiğ
Higher energy
Şalgam Yaprağı
Score leader
Ebegümeci, Çiğ
Nutrient split
12 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Şalgam Yaprağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 28.0 kcal and Şalgam Yaprağı has 42.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 94 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ebegümeci, Çiğ | Şalgam Yaprağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 312 µg | 380 µg | +21.8% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.04 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.07 mg | -36.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.19 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 114 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 3740 µg | 4434 µg | +18.6% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 34.2 mg | 26.5 mg | -22.5% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.78 mg | -35.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 3.4 g | +6.2% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.2 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 42 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 114 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 36 mg | 28 mg | -22.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 410 µg | 358 µg | -12.7% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 249 mg | 133 mg | -46.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.8 g | 4.23 g | -11.9% |
| Kolesterol | — | 2 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 8170 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 21 mg | -44.7% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.03 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.87 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 448 mg | 197 mg | -56.0% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 1.11 g | -47.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.68 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.14 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 11 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.9 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.07 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.4 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.14 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 149 mg | +1141.7% |
| Su | 84.5 g | 90.55 g | +7.2% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.72 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | 114 µg | +307.1% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.92 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 2.77 g | +1285.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.82 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.52 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.14 mg | -53.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Şalgam Yaprağı.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 42 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 0.2 g and Şalgam Yaprağı has 2.77 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ebegümeci, Çiğ 94, Şalgam Yaprağı 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.