Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
23 kcal
Score
99 / 100
Ispanak (Pişmiş) has a higher nutrition quality score (99) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 23(-17.9%)
Score Diff
94 vs 99(+5.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ispanak (Pişmiş)
Higher energy
Ebegümeci, Çiğ
Score leader
Ispanak (Pişmiş)
Nutrient split
4 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Ispanak (Pişmiş) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 28.0 kcal and Ispanak (Pişmiş) has 23.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 94 and 99. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ebegümeci, Çiğ | Ispanak (Pişmiş) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 312 µg | 469 µg | +50.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.19 mg | +72.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.24 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 3740 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 34.2 mg | 28.1 mg | -17.8% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 2.7 mg | +125.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 2.2 g | -31.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 23 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 194 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 36 mg | 49 mg | +36.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 410 µg | 483 µg | +17.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 249 mg | 99 mg | -60.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.8 g | 3.6 g | -25.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 79 mg | +107.9% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.72 mg | +80.0% |
| Potasyum | 448 mg | 558 mg | +24.6% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.9 g | +38.1% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 70 mg | +483.3% |
| Su | 84.5 g | 91.4 g | +8.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.4 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.5 mg | +66.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Ispanak (Pişmiş).
Ispanak (Pişmiş) has less energy per 100 g (23 kcal versus 28 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 12 mg and Ispanak (Pişmiş) has 70 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ebegümeci, Çiğ 94, Ispanak (Pişmiş) 99.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.