Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (94) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
28 vs 58(+107.1%)
Score Diff
94 vs 60(-36.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ebegümeci, Çiğ
Higher energy
Yeşillik
Score leader
Ebegümeci, Çiğ
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Yeşillik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 28.0 kcal and Yeşillik has 58.0 kcal. The difference is 30.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 94 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ebegümeci, Çiğ | Yeşillik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 312 µg | 259 µg | -17.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 7 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.21 mg | +90.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.17 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 72 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 3740 µg | 2956 µg | -21.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 26 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 34.2 mg | 45.3 mg | +32.5% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.12 mg | -6.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 4.1 g | +28.1% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.98 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 58 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 72 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 36 mg | 42 mg | +16.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 410 µg | 409.9 µg | -0.0% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 249 mg | 228 mg | -8.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.8 g | 5.02 g | +4.6% |
| Kolesterol | — | 2 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 5396 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 31 mg | -18.4% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.9 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.88 mg | +120.0% |
| Potasyum | 448 mg | 294 mg | -34.4% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 2.89 g | +37.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.79 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.29 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 11 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 1.1 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.07 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.44 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.14 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 163 mg | +1258.3% |
| Su | 84.5 g | 86.9 g | +2.8% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | 72 µg | +157.1% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 10.2 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 3.4 g | +1600.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.72 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.3 mg | 0.29 mg | -3.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ebegümeci, Çiğ and Yeşillik.
Ebegümeci, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 58 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Ebegümeci, Çiğ has 0.2 g and Yeşillik has 3.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ebegümeci, Çiğ 94, Yeşillik 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.