Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
281 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Ancho biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
25 vs 281(+1024.0%)
Score Diff
84 vs 100(+19.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ancho biberi
Higher energy
Ancho biberi
Score leader
Ancho biberi
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dulse yosunu and Ancho biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dulse yosunu has 25.0 kcal and Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal. The difference is 256.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 84 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dulse yosunu | Ancho biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 16 µg | 1317 µg | +8131.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.1 mg | 0.33 mg | +230.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.92 mg | +338.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | 2.14 mg | +1237.5% |
| Bakir | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 15800 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3 mg | 4.1 mg | +36.7% |
| Demir | 5.2 mg | 4.13 mg | -20.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.5 g | 23.1 g | +824.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.82 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 120 µg | 58 µg | -51.7% |
| Fosfor | 120 mg | 201 mg | +67.5% |
| İyot | 1500 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 87 mg | 148 mg | +70.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.4 g | 51.44 g | +1069.1% |
| Kül | 6.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 220 mg | 88 mg | -60.0% |
| Niasin | 1.8 mg | 7.8 mg | +333.3% |
| Potasyum | 1720 mg | 2589 mg | +50.5% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 11.86 g | +270.6% |
| Sodyum | 650 mg | 44 mg | -93.2% |
| Su | 85 g | 14.5 g | -82.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.42 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 8.2 g | +2633.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.12 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 31.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.8 mg | 1.4 mg | +75.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dulse yosunu and Ancho biberi.
Dulse yosunu has less energy per 100 g (25 kcal versus 281 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Dulse yosunu has 16 µg and Ancho biberi has 1317 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dulse yosunu 84, Ancho biberi 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.