Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
281 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Ancho biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
48 vs 281(+485.4%)
Score Diff
0 vs 43(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ancho biberi
Higher energy
Ancho biberi
Score leader
Ancho biberi
Nutrient split
4 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Deniz yosunu tuzu and Ancho biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Deniz yosunu tuzu has 48.0 kcal and Ancho biberi has 281.0 kcal. The difference is 233.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Deniz yosunu tuzu | Ancho biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 45 µg | 1317 µg | +2826.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.33 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.92 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 2.14 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 15800 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | 4.1 mg | +28.1% |
| Demir | 8.6 mg | 4.13 mg | -52.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.5 g | 23.1 g | +413.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.82 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | 58 µg | +107.1% |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 201 mg | +136.5% |
| İyot | 5200 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 16.5 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 420 mg | 148 mg | -64.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.2 g | 51.44 g | +459.1% |
| Kül | 79.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 540 mg | 88 mg | -83.7% |
| Mangan | 0.82 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 7.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1850 mg | 2589 mg | +39.9% |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 11.86 g | +394.2% |
| Selenyum | 12.4 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 31200 mg | 44 mg | -99.9% |
| Su | 3.8 g | 14.5 g | +281.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.42 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 8.2 g | +1950.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.12 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.3 g | 31.8 g | +10500.0% |
| Çinko | 1.25 mg | 1.4 mg | +12.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Deniz yosunu tuzu and Ancho biberi.
Deniz yosunu tuzu has less energy per 100 g (48 kcal versus 281 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Deniz yosunu tuzu has 0.3 g and Ancho biberi has 31.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Deniz yosunu tuzu 0, Ancho biberi 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.