Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
67 / 100
Alaska pollock has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
786 vs 81(-89.7%)
Score Diff
8 vs 67(+737.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alaska pollock
Higher energy
Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği
Score leader
Alaska pollock
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği and Alaska pollock are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği has 786.0 kcal and Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 705.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 67. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği | Alaska pollock | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.046 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.45 µg | 3.1 µg | +588.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.106 mg | -11.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 4.5 mg | 0.24 mg | -94.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Fosfor | 107 mg | 184 mg | +72.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 10 mg | -9.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 119 mg | 71 mg | -40.3% |
| Kül | 1.4 g | 1.2 g | -14.3% |
| Magnezyum | 3 mg | 67 mg | +2133.3% |
| Niasin | 0.41 mg | 1.32 mg | +222.0% |
| Potasyum | 224 mg | 356 mg | +58.9% |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 17.18 g | +156.4% |
| Selenyum | — | 36.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 104 mg | 99 mg | -4.8% |
| Su | 7.5 g | 81.18 g | +982.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 39.8 g | 0.14 g | -99.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 36.8 g | 0.12 g | -99.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 84.4 g | 0.8 g | -99.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.4 g | 0.34 g | -75.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.82 mg | 0.46 mg | -43.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği and Alaska pollock.
Alaska pollock has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 786 kcal).
For measured Magnezyum, Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği has 3 mg and Alaska pollock has 67 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dana İlikli Kaval Kemiği 8, Alaska pollock 67.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.