Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
1 kcal
Score
91 / 100
Hibiskus çayı has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
251 vs 1(-99.6%)
Score Diff
46 vs 91(+97.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hibiskus çayı
Higher energy
Dana döş
Score leader
Hibiskus çayı
Nutrient split
12 - 2 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dana döş and Hibiskus çayı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dana döş has 251.0 kcal and Hibiskus çayı has 1.0 kcal. The difference is 250.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 91. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dana döş | Hibiskus çayı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.058 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.38 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.162 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.33 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.075 mg | 0.002 mg | -97.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.94 mg | 0.08 mg | -95.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 1 mg | -99.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 8 mg | -27.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0.08 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 0.88 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 17 mg | 3 mg | -82.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.012 mg | — |
| Niasin | 3.75 mg | 0.04 mg | -98.9% |
| Potasyum | 285 mg | 9 mg | -96.8% |
| Protein | 18.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 21.6 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 58 mg | 4 mg | -93.1% |
| Su | 61.2 g | 99.58 g | +62.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.95 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 6 µg | 1 µg | -83.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | 64.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.24 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 19.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.62 mg | 0.01 mg | -99.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dana döş and Hibiskus çayı.
Hibiskus çayı has less energy per 100 g (1 kcal versus 251 kcal).
For measured Protein, Dana döş has 18.2 g and Hibiskus çayı has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dana döş 46, Hibiskus çayı 91.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.