Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Cranberry fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (49) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
113 vs 32(-71.7%)
Score Diff
49 vs 47(-4.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Cranberry fasulyesi
Higher energy
Cranberry fasulyesi
Score leader
Cranberry fasulyesi
Nutrient split
14 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Cranberry fasulyesi and Yeşil papaya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Cranberry fasulyesi has 113.0 kcal and Yeşil papaya has 32.0 kcal. The difference is 81.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Cranberry fasulyesi | Yeşil papaya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 24 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.02 mg | -90.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.03 mg | -50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.03 mg | -75.0% |
| Bakir | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 274 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 60.9 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 0.25 mg | -90.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 1.8 g | -73.1% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 113 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 200 µg | 38 µg | -81.0% |
| Fosfor | 147 mg | 5 mg | -96.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 62 mg | 24 mg | -61.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 8.8 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 20.6 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 83 mg | 10 mg | -88.0% |
| Mangan | 0.45 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.63 mg | 0.35 mg | -44.4% |
| Nisasta | 13.5 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 408 mg | 180 mg | -55.9% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 0.6 g | -92.7% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 3 mg | +50.0% |
| Su | 67.5 g | 91.5 g | +35.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.5 g | 0.1 g | -80.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.3 g | 5 g | +1566.7% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.07 mg | -93.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Cranberry fasulyesi and Yeşil papaya.
Yeşil papaya has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 113 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Cranberry fasulyesi has 0.3 g and Yeşil papaya has 5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Cranberry fasulyesi 49, Yeşil papaya 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.