Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Cranberry fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (49) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
113 vs 379(+235.4%)
Score Diff
49 vs 27(-44.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Cranberry fasulyesi
Higher energy
Glutensiz yulaf
Score leader
Cranberry fasulyesi
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Cranberry fasulyesi and Glutensiz yulaf are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Cranberry fasulyesi has 113.0 kcal and Glutensiz yulaf has 379.0 kcal. The difference is 266.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Cranberry fasulyesi | Glutensiz yulaf | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.46 mg | +119.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.1 mg | +66.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.22 mg | 0.39 mg | +77.3% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4 g | — |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 4.25 mg | +70.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 10.1 g | +50.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 113 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 200 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 147 mg | 410 mg | +178.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 62 mg | 52 mg | -16.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 67.7 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 20.6 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 83 mg | 138 mg | +66.3% |
| Mangan | 0.45 mg | 3.63 mg | +706.7% |
| Niasin | 0.63 mg | 1.1 mg | +74.6% |
| Nisasta | 13.5 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 408 mg | 362 mg | -11.3% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 13.15 g | +60.4% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 67.5 g | 8.2 g | -87.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | 1.11 g | +1010.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 32 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.07 g | 2.18 g | +3014.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.5 g | 6.52 g | +1204.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.2 g | 2.54 g | +1170.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 3.64 mg | +230.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Cranberry fasulyesi and Glutensiz yulaf.
Cranberry fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (113 kcal versus 379 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Cranberry fasulyesi has 0.07 g and Glutensiz yulaf has 2.18 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Cranberry fasulyesi 49, Glutensiz yulaf 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.