Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Cranberry fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (49) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
113 vs 357(+215.9%)
Score Diff
49 vs 1(-98.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Cranberry fasulyesi
Higher energy
Ararot nişastası
Score leader
Cranberry fasulyesi
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Cranberry fasulyesi and Ararot nişastası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Cranberry fasulyesi has 113.0 kcal and Ararot nişastası has 357.0 kcal. The difference is 244.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 1. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Cranberry fasulyesi | Ararot nişastası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.013 mg | -93.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.005 mg | -91.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.22 mg | 0.121 mg | -45.0% |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 0.33 mg | -86.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 3.4 g | -49.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 113 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 200 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 147 mg | 5 mg | -96.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 62 mg | 40 mg | -35.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 88.15 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 20.6 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 0.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 83 mg | 3 mg | -96.4% |
| Mangan | 0.45 mg | 0.116 mg | -74.2% |
| Niasin | 0.63 mg | 0.082 mg | -87.0% |
| Nisasta | 13.5 g | 84.75 g | +527.8% |
| Potasyum | 408 mg | 11 mg | -97.3% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 0.32 g | -96.1% |
| Selenyum | 1.2 µg | 0.7 µg | -41.7% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 21 mg | +950.0% |
| Su | 67.5 g | 11.32 g | -83.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | 0.015 g | -85.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 7 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.5 g | 0.07 g | -86.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.06 mg | -94.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Cranberry fasulyesi and Ararot nişastası.
Cranberry fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (113 kcal versus 357 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Cranberry fasulyesi has 2 mg and Ararot nişastası has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Cranberry fasulyesi 49, Ararot nişastası 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.