Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
15 kcal
Score
85 / 100
Çiriş Otu has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
37 vs 15(-59.5%)
Score Diff
95 vs 85(-10.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çiriş Otu
Higher energy
Çiriş Otu
Score leader
Çiriş Otu
Nutrient split
19 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çiriş Otu and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çiriş Otu has 37.0 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 22.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 95 and 85. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çiriş Otu | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 154 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.07 mg | 0.027 mg | -61.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.033 mg | -70.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.041 mg | -65.8% |
| Beta Karoten | 1850 µg | 45 µg | -97.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 46 mg | 2.8 mg | -93.9% |
| Demir | 2.35 mg | 0.28 mg | -88.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 0.5 g | -82.1% |
| Folat DFE | 48 µg | 7 µg | -85.4% |
| Fosfor | 44 mg | 24 mg | -45.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 112 mg | 16 mg | -85.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.2 g | 3.63 g | -41.5% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 13 mg | -51.9% |
| Mangan | 0.36 mg | 0.079 mg | -78.1% |
| Niasin | 0.68 mg | 0.098 mg | -85.6% |
| Potasyum | 345 mg | 147 mg | -57.4% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 0.65 g | -69.0% |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 2 mg | -87.5% |
| Su | 89.2 g | 95.23 g | +6.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.11 g | -72.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.58 mg | 0.2 mg | -65.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çiriş Otu and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 37 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Çiriş Otu has 1850 µg and Acur has 45 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çiriş Otu 95, Acur 85.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Çiriş Otu · Acur · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.