Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
118 kcal
Score
0 / 100
Çin beş baharatı has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
347 vs 118(-66.0%)
Score Diff
58 vs 0(-100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Çin beş baharatı
Higher energy
Çin beş baharatı
Score leader
Çin beş baharatı
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çin beş baharatı and Kereviz tuzu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çin beş baharatı has 347.0 kcal and Kereviz tuzu has 118.0 kcal. The difference is 229.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 0. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çin beş baharatı | Kereviz tuzu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 35 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.1 mg | -44.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.26 mg | 0.11 mg | -57.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | 0.07 mg | -87.0% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 0.15 mg | -82.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 18.2 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 19.5 mg | 13.5 mg | -30.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 29.8 g | 3.6 g | -87.9% |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 745 mg | 372 mg | -50.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.6 g | 12.3 g | -79.0% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | 71 g | +1239.6% |
| Magnezyum | 185 mg | 132 mg | -28.6% |
| Mangan | 9.2 mg | 0.6 mg | -93.5% |
| Niasin | 2.85 mg | 0.9 mg | -68.4% |
| Potasyum | 1420 mg | 420 mg | -70.4% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 5.4 g | -34.1% |
| Sodyum | 52 mg | 28000 mg | +53746.2% |
| Su | 8.5 g | 3 g | -64.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 1.2 g | -42.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.5 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.4 g | 7.5 g | -39.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 2 mg | -16.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çin beş baharatı and Kereviz tuzu.
Kereviz tuzu has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 347 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Çin beş baharatı has 52 mg and Kereviz tuzu has 28000 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çin beş baharatı 58, Kereviz tuzu 0.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.