Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
659 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Brezilya Cevizi has a higher nutrition quality score (24) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
579 vs 659(+13.8%)
Score Diff
23 vs 24(+4.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Brezilya Cevizi
Higher energy
Brezilya Cevizi
Score leader
Brezilya Cevizi
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çiğ Badem and Brezilya Cevizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çiğ Badem has 579.0 kcal and Brezilya Cevizi has 659.0 kcal. The difference is 80.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çiğ Badem | Brezilya Cevizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.617 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.138 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.031 mg | 1.74 mg | +68.8% |
| Demir | 3.71 mg | 2.43 mg | -34.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.5 g | 7.5 g | -40.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 25.6 mg | 5.73 mg | -77.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 579 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 22 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 481 mg | 725 mg | +50.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 269 mg | 160 mg | -40.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 21.55 g | 12.27 g | -43.1% |
| Magnezyum | 270 mg | 376 mg | +39.3% |
| Mangan | 2.179 mg | 1.22 mg | -44.0% |
| Niasin | 3.618 mg | 0.295 mg | -91.8% |
| Potasyum | 733 mg | 597 mg | -18.6% |
| Protein | 21.15 g | 14.32 g | -32.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 1917 µg | — |
| Su | 4.41 g | 3.48 g | -21.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.802 g | 15.13 g | +297.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 31.551 g | 24.55 g | -22.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 49.93 g | 66.43 g | +33.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 12.329 g | 20.58 g | +66.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.33 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.12 mg | 4.06 mg | +30.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çiğ Badem and Brezilya Cevizi.
Çiğ Badem has less energy per 100 g (579 kcal versus 659 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Çiğ Badem has 3.802 g and Brezilya Cevizi has 15.13 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çiğ Badem 23, Brezilya Cevizi 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.