Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
315 kcal
Score
76 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
314 vs 315(+0.3%)
Score Diff
59 vs 76(+28.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Chipotle biberi and Adaçayı (Kuru) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Chipotle biberi has 314.0 kcal and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 59 and 76. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Chipotle biberi | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1250 µg | 295 µg | -76.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.75 mg | +150.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.9 mg | 0.34 mg | -62.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 2.69 mg | +28.1% |
| Bakir | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 15 mg | 31.4 mg | +109.3% |
| Demir | 12.5 mg | 28.12 mg | +125.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 28.7 g | 40.3 g | +40.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 7.48 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 314 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 274 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 91 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1714 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 150 mg | 1652 mg | +1001.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 55.4 g | 60.73 g | +9.6% |
| Kül | 6.7 g | 7.93 g | +18.4% |
| Magnezyum | 145 mg | 428 mg | +195.2% |
| Mangan | 1.8 mg | 3.13 mg | +73.9% |
| Niasin | 12.5 mg | 5.72 mg | -54.2% |
| Potasyum | 1870 mg | 1070 mg | -42.8% |
| Protein | 11.2 g | 10.63 g | -5.1% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 11 mg | -63.3% |
| Su | 8.5 g | 7.96 g | -6.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 7.01 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.87 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 12.75 g | +55.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.76 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.71 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.1 mg | 4.7 mg | +123.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Chipotle biberi and Adaçayı (Kuru).
Chipotle biberi has less energy per 100 g (314 kcal versus 315 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Chipotle biberi has 150 mg and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 1652 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Chipotle biberi 59, Adaçayı (Kuru) 76.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.