Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Biber has a higher nutrition quality score (62) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
118 vs 168(+42.4%)
Score Diff
62 vs 37(-40.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber
Higher energy
Kibby, Porto Riko usulü
Score leader
Biber
Nutrient split
25 - 22 (tie: 18)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Biber and Kibby, Porto Riko usulü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Biber has 118.0 kcal and Kibby, Porto Riko usulü has 168.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 37. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Biber | Kibby, Porto Riko usulü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 12 µg | 1 µg | -91.7% |
| Alfa Karoten | 11 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.06 mg | -25.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.63 µg | 0.55 µg | -12.7% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.08 mg | -11.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| Bakir | 0.14 mg | 0.11 mg | -21.4% |
| Besin folati | 50 µg | 8 µg | -84.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 114 µg | 3 µg | -97.4% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 17 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6.3 mg | 0.9 mg | -85.7% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.91 mg | 1.25 mg | -34.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3 g | 3.1 g | +3.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.46 mg | 0.08 mg | -82.6% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 118 kj | 168 kj | +42.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 50 µg | 8 µg | -84.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 107 mg | 121 mg | +13.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.6 µg | 1.9 µg | -58.7% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 21 mg | 22 mg | +4.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.25 g | 17.99 g | +75.5% |
| Kolesterol | 22 mg | 24 mg | +9.1% |
| Likopen | 2137 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 19 µg | 45 µg | +136.8% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 44 mg | +76.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.15 g | 0.25 g | +66.7% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.61 g | 2.68 g | +66.5% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.75 mg | 2.31 mg | +32.0% |
| Potasyum | 285 mg | 206 mg | -27.7% |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 8.76 g | -10.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.19 g | 0.26 g | +36.8% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.08 g | 0.03 g | -62.5% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 1 µg | 0.0% |
| Selenyum | 6.6 µg | 5.8 µg | -12.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.12 g | 0.2 g | +66.7% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.93 g | 1.52 g | +63.4% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.5 g | 0.82 g | +64.0% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 340 mg | 558 mg | +64.1% |
| Su | 74.06 g | 63.89 g | -13.7% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.62 g | 2.67 g | +64.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 50 µg | 8 µg | -84.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 34.3 mg | 24.5 mg | -28.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.84 g | 3.09 g | +67.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.33 g | 7.2 g | +66.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.28 g | 0.3 g | +7.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.48 g | 0.8 g | -45.9% |
| Çinko | 1.98 mg | 1.89 mg | -4.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Biber and Kibby, Porto Riko usulü.
Biber has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 168 kcal).
For measured Lutein + zeaksantin, Biber has 19 µg and Kibby, Porto Riko usulü has 45 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Biber 62, Kibby, Porto Riko usulü 37.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.